|
![]() People working in governments in Australia, tend not to listen, usually will not look and too often pretend not to hear anyone who may contradict, or argue with, their beliefs, views, ideologies and fantasies. |
|
|
|
Nothing seems to change NSW has experienced a change of government. Some of the revious members of the parliament have moved on. Many of the former NSW labor party hierarchy remain. They have simply moved up the ladder of narrow patronage. The constituency of governments in Australia are made of career parasites of the public purse with little or no experience outside of politics, trade union or party machinery. Government also changed in Victoria and there it also appears that nothing much changes. Barry O'Farrell Premier of NSW and Ted ballieu of Victoria are both bland, almost colourless. They each have inept Ministers within their senior ranks. In Victoria it is the Minister for Police, Peter Ryan, and Minister for Human Services mary Wooldridge. Ms Wooldridge, when faced with systemic failure of her department to look after children prattles about endemic culture and like the labor Minister before her fiddles while children suffer. In NSW, the mantle for incompetncy, or lack of attention to detail, appears to be taken by the Minister for the the Environment, Robyn Parker. The media have had a field day quoting her statements such as "logging protects koalas" and "there is something systemically wrong at Orica and I am calling on the top person at Orica, whoever that may be, to step up and explain to the community". What does Minister parker think her role and responsibilities might be? Ms Parker is a former teacher and her talents lie in her community and education work for maitland. She is not evident as an administrator of the environment. It has become clear, across Australia, that skill, and competency, are not prerequisites for high office in any government and bureaucracy. It is as if novices are put into roles and then allowed to learn at great expense, and risk, to the public purse and too often life and limb of citizens young and old. The NSW bureaucracy, in particular, under Ministers past, has been found to be inept, corrupt and incompetent, generally, across the board spectrum of portfolios. Contracts, and business opportunities, in the tens of millions, are issued without regard to probity, due process or public interest and value. Past, and present, governments have allowed the bureaucracy to fossilise and become unresponsive to the public interest. Barry O'Farrell has, in a similar manner to Ted Ballieu in Victoria, quickly demonstrated that he may lack the capacity, or willingness, to get a handle on these inherent risks and embedded culture. Cultures that are fiunded on unethical behaviour, lack of accountability and divestment of responsibility. Cultures that cost the nation collectively, billions of dollars. Governments bleat about their budgets, and finances, whilst hypocritically wasting millions protecting their own vested interests, avoid accountability or delay decisions. ("The crumbling quality of Australia's governments and administrations", Kevin R Beck, November 2011) |
|
MASSIVE PRICE RISES FOR FOOD, ENERGY AND OTHER COSTS UNDER FEDERAL LABOR AND THE CLEAN ENERGY BILLS ![]() State governments are on a destructive path that will cost the nation jobs, careers and livelihoods. They are feeding communities subsidies that are unsustainable. Most of these programmes are legacy of labor state governments. Coupled with the federal labor, Greens and independents dangerous Clean Energy legislation, you may expect massive cost rises in utilities. |
|
Premier of New South wales, Ms Krtisine Kenneally, has taken control of a major property precinct development in Sydney (October 2010) and again demonstrates the inane approach to economic and social development in Australia's most populous city and state. There are costly public sector agencies and processes, in place, that are supposed to manage such processes, and activity, between the developer business interests, the government, the bureaucracy, the local governments and the City of Sydney administration. These structures have their own responsible Ministers. However in the myopic, and ego driven, refined atmosphere of the nation's senior politicians things will, apparently, only occur if the boss takes charge. We could work through all of the theories of good management, and best practice, inn this article but they would still be subject to the hubris of the failed government of NSW and its constituents The loud, clamouring vested interests represented by the public faces of those who control things in NSW drown out any logic or ethical arguments and approaches and dummy spits and acrionious diatribe is the norm. The media, instead of analysing why the decision of the Premier is not the best approach, focuses on whether the Minister Tony Kelly is being sidelined, demoted or bein dispensed with. The Premier has trotted out the usual spin claiming that the Minister has to concentrate on his newest created bureaucracy - "The Sydney Metropolitian Delivery Authority". When governments, and the bureaucracy, fail and are shown to be incompetent they turn to the tried and tested diversion, create a new bureaucracy and then blather on, publicise and crow, how effective they are in setting this new structure up. Meanwhile the people of NSW, and anyone trying to do business there in the state of NSW, can bide their time and waste their resources, in resigned acceptance, bemoaning yet again the cancer of stupidity, and mediocrity, crushing the life out of NSW is continuing its spread. ![]() The very comely Ms. Kristine says "As Premier I will ensure that Sydney does not lose this opportunity to create something iconic." How admirable, and yet condescending, of her. The icon will actually be created by investors and meanwhile Ms Kenneally will bask in that sunshine whilst being unable to offer the same gaurantee the same attention to the bread, and butter, performance of government and the rest of the public sector under the labor government management of NSW. Extracts from reports of the NSW Ombudsman "The Department of Community Services (DoCS) is charged with promoting the safety and welfare of the most vulnerable members of the community — children. The DoCS annual report highlights its core work as including: protecting children and young people from risk of harm; helping families protect and care for their children; providing care and support for children who cannot live with their families; supporting homeless children; and regulating adoption services. I have become increasingly concerned about a number of issues facing DoCS that are impacting on its core work. In my annual report to Parliament last year I flagged that my office had identified a number of systemic issues of concern from the complaints received. Those concerns are now reflected in significant and extensive investigations and other inquiries my officers are conducting into DoCS. This scrutiny is unprecedented, touching almost every area of DoCS operations. My officers are examining: DoCS failing to properly investigate allegations of employees abusing children, DoCS response to increased reports of child abuse, DoCS implementation of recommendations, arising from investigations into child deaths, to reduce risk to children, DoCS failing to transfer information between offices concerning children at risk when families move, the recruitment and training of foster carers by DoCS, including preventing abuse of children in foster care, DoCS failing to notify my office about allegations concerning DoCS employees abusing children, so that its investigations can be properly scrutinised, decisions by DoCS about intervening in Family Court proceedings to protect children at risk of harm, and DoCS procedures for responding to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. The totality of the information to date places a cloud over the effectiveness of DoCS to provide comprehensive protection to children and young people. The law governing how the Ombudsman works prevents my office from making our investigations and findings public except by way of annual reports and reports to Parliament. The totality of the information to date places a cloud over the effectiveness of DoCS to provide comprehensive protection to children and young people. The law governing how the Ombudsman works prevents my office from making our investigations and findings public except by way of annual reports and reports to Parliament. DoCS is the lead agency in protecting children and young people. The community rightly expects it to perform core work to a very high standard. It is not enough that DoCS officers are committed and well-intentioned. Without the right systems, records and support, appropriate child protection interventions become as much a matter of good luck as good management. This report demonstrates the clear link between poor internal processes and ineffective DoCS interventions on the ground." (source: DOCS: CRITICAL ISSUES Concerns arising from investigations into the Department of Community Services A special report to Parliament under s 31 of the Ombudsman Act 1974 April 2002) FAST FORWARD TO 2009, WHAT HAS CHANGED? "Debate resumed from 1 April 2009. The Hon. MARIE FICARRA [11.14 a.m.]: All members agree that it is so important that our society ensures the protection of children and the vulnerable. For too long, the soft pleas of the vulnerable have gone unheard. Children have been abused and neglected and their cries for help ignored by this Labor Government. Professionals and non-government organisations have stated the obvious: reform of child protection is needed. However, it has taken a very long time for some type of substantive action to take place. In 1997 the Wood royal commission exposed many tragic stories regarding the care and protection of children and young people in this State. It should concern us, as legislators, very much to think that 10 years later the Parliament is still learning of horrific stories involving children and young people, and it should make us determined to act decisively. Let us cast our minds in sympathy to those whom the system failed. Seven-year-old Shelley Ward was allowed to starve to death although her family had been the subject of notifications to the Department of Community Services over a 14-year period. Toddler Dean Shillingsworth was found in a suitcase. A 10-month-old baby, Missy, was beaten senseless after having been on the Department of Community Services' radar by virtue of at least four reports. Another toddler, three-year-old Emily, was the victim of a brutal bashing by her mother's boyfriend and died a painful death. On 18 December 2002, some five years after the royal commission, which exposed varying acts of abuse against children and young people, the New South Wales Labor Government announced a $1.2 billion plan to protect the most vulnerable. Clearly, this plan alone has not worked. Between 1 December 2002 and 20 December 2003, the New South Wales Ombudsman, Mr Bruce Barbour, reported there were 121 deaths of children known to the Department of Community Services. This amounts to a death rate of 9.31 children a month. In 2003 a three-year-old boy died after being violently sexually abused at the hands of two paedophiles, despite seven notifications to the Department of Community Services. The department was notified repeatedly of concerns. However, this poor child was found dead, having suffered severe injuries, with one of his attackers attempting to revive him using electrical wires. That is horrific—even worse, it was avoidable. I put all those deaths on record because they must never be forgotten. Sadly, 2004 saw a further 96 children die. In 2005, 109 children died. In 2006 the number of deaths increased further to 114. What is most startling is that the New South Wales Ombudsman's 2007 report exposed that the Department of Community Services knew one in six of these children. The Ombudsman said: Approximately half of the children that were the subject of reports to DOCS identified in the report at the time of death had had their files closed. It is absolutely beyond belief that although the department knew that these children were at risk of harm their files had been closed. Back then, Mr Barbour rightly stated: We see too many files closed, too many cases not attended to in circumstances where they should be. So the alarm bells were ringing loud and clear, but did this Labor Government hear them? No." (Extract from NSW parliamentary debate: CHILDREN LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WOOD INQUIRY RECOMMENDATIONS) BILL 2009: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LC20090402011) Extract: "DoCS failed to protect body-in-suitcase boy Murdered: Dean Shillingsworth. (News Limited) Related Story: Body-in-suitcase mother jailed An ombudsman's investigation into the murder of Sydney toddler Dean Shillingsworth has found the Department of Community Services (DoCS) failed to protect him, even though it had been warned he was at risk. The two-year-old's body was found stuffed in a suitcase floating on a lake in Ambarvale in Sydney's south west in 2007. Yesterday his mother Rachel Pfitzner was sentenced to at least 19 years in prison after pleading guilty to his murder. The court heard that she loathed her son and killed him on the day she was meant to return him to his grandparents and guardians. In his report into the boy's death the Ombudsman, Bruce Barbour, found that DoCS had received 34 reports that the toddler and his siblings were at risk of harm, but had failed to comprehensively assess them." (Source: ABC News,http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/10/2767308.htm) |
|
The Labor Government of NSW is consumed with self interest rather than government of the people, by the people, for the people. In NSW it is use government for the promotion of political party interests regardless of cost and
outcomes. On the one side critics say: "NSW economy is the worst By Lillian Saleh and Jenny Dillon From: The Daily Telegraph January 11, 2010 12:00am ... (however what does the government say?) ....The Government denied that the economy was as bad as indicated. "The NSW economy has grown to more than $382 billion, leading the states and accounting for almost one-third of the national economy," said acting Treasurer John Hatzistergos. "NSW is the engine room of the Australian economy."(Source: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/money/money-matters/nsw-economy-is-the-worst/story-fn300aev-1225817873593) And yet again: "Failed state NSW, John Birmingham, The Monthly 11 December 2009This essay explores the endemic problems that plague New South Wales, to its economic, commercial and political detriment. “The end of the boom was less a sudden bursting of an asset bubble than a long period of gradual but relentless entropy to the point where, in January of this year, Access Economics identified New South Wales as having the worst state economy in the country; a wooden spoon traditionally presented to Tasmania or South Australia. It wasn’t all bad, though. In July the finance boffins predicted the situation would soon stabilise because … ‘The state simply won’t get any worse, it’s fallen so far. When you are already in the gutter it is hard to fall much further.’” In “Failed State”, John Birmingham insightfully explores the endemic problems that plague New South Wales, to its economic, commercial and political detriment. Birmingham charts the state’s descent into recession, while also discussing its widespread institutional corruption; with so many self-serving interests in play, there is very little room left for those that would attempt to rectify the situation." (source: Australian policy On Line: http://www.apo.org.au/research/failed-state-nsw, PUBLICATION TYPE Article PUBLISHER TYPE APO Member, Journal COVERAGE Australia, New South Wales PERMANENT URL http://www.apo.org.au/node/19964) |
|
The state of NSW is the largest in the Australian nation with a multi billion dollar budget.
Imagine a board of a company appointing a CEO to run a billion dollar corporation with tens of millions of customers, tens of tousands of employees and assets in the billions with these qualifications. "Premier of New South wales, Kristina Keneally MP, Like 40% of the people who live in the electorate of Heffron, Kristina Keneally was born overseas. She is married to Ben Keneally and has two sons, Daniel (11 years old) and Brendan (9 years old). She lives in Pagewood in Sydney’s inner south. The child of an Australian mother and an American father, Kristina was born on 19 December 1968 and grew up in the United States. She moved to Sydney in 1994, and married Ben in 1996. Kristina became an Australian citizen in 2000. Kristina studied at the University of Dayton in Ohio. She holds a BA in Political Science (Hons) and an MA in Religious Studies. Kristina has also worked as the NSW Youth Coordinator for the Society of St Vincent de Paul and taught in a ‘teacher shortage area’ in rural New Mexico. Prior to her election to NSW Parliament, Kristina was a full time mum to her sons. Like many other mothers, she now enjoys the challenge of balancing work and family life. Kristina was elected to Parliament on 22 March 2003." (Source: http://www.nswalp.com/labor-people/5/71/kristina-keneally-mp) ms Keneally was not appointed (elected ) by the millions of voters, but by a handful of labor politicians. (Kevin R Beck) |
|
January 2010: The public servants in NSW are delusional and have fogotten teir place as servants. Read this tripe from a senior police officer, in NSW, who thinks because aa minority in the community give him a bad day the whole community should suffer. "Make Australia Day a light beer day: police, Posted Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:33am AEDT, Updated Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:52am AEDT Police want to stop the problems associated with alcohol on Australia Day. (ABC News: Giulio Saggin) "A senior policeman with the New South Wales Alcohol and Licensing Branch has called on bottle shops and pubs to restrict sales of full-strength alcohol on Australia Day. Chief Inspector Guy Haberley sent an email to licensees in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong earlier this week. One of the measures he proposed was that they not sell any drink with an alcohol content higher than 4 per cent before 2pm on January 26. He also asked for no pre-mixed drinks over 5 per cent to be sold after 9pm; no shots or doubles; a limit of two drinks per person after 9pm and for food and water to be provided. Chief Inspector Haberley says he made the suggestions after a jump in alcohol-fuelled violence on the public holiday last year." (Source:ABC Australia, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/01/14/2791932.htm) " POLICE DECIDE AUSTRALIA DAY BAN NOW VOLUNTARY AND WILL NOT BE ENFORCED Police have responded to industry concerns regarding the request to limit the sale of alcohol on Australia Day to drinks less than four per cent, by agreeing not to enforce the limit and allowing it to be voluntary. Liquor Stores Association (LSA) of NSW CEO Terry Mott told TheShout.com.au this afternoon that LSA NSW and other industry associations have been actively working with government to modify their request. “We are committed to work together with Police and the Offices of Liquor, Gaming & Racing (OLGR) to formulate a resolution. They have responded by saying this is a voluntary request and it will not be enforced,” Mott told TheShout.com.au. Chief Inspector Guy Haberley this week emailed liquor accords across New South Wales asking licensees not to sell drinks with an alcohol content of more than four per cent before 2pm along with a range of other measures. The request has led industry bodies like LSA of NSW to seek clarification on this issue from the OLGR and the NSW Police Minister. The government has indicated this does not reflect policy and police have issued follow-up advice confirming this is not a regulatory requirement – and will not be enforced." (Source: The Shout, http://theshout.com.au/2010/01/15/article/Police-decide-Australia-Day-ban-now-voluntary-and-will-not-be-enforced/AYNEXZPEXV) |
|
September 2009 (Kevin R Beck): Premier (Red Hot Go) Rees might like to demonstrate that he is a real leader
and in charge of government by cleaning up the
NSW public service and installing senior public servants and middle managers who are both competent and engaged in developing and delivering services. Unfortunatley "red Hot" will not be around long enough to do it. He will be on his political bike in the last few months of 2009.
labor (NSW) will pick another puppet to do their bidding.
There is not one government agency that does not need cleaning out in NSW but the Ministers, held captive by unions and factions refuse to carry out their public duty. The Premier wants to bring John Robertson, a union leader, into the Ministry. Mr. Robertson is one of the many barriers to efficiency, performance and growth who have brought the state to its economic and socia knees during the past twelve or more years. ohn Robertson is the face of a corrosove self interested group who have fed from the trough of others (union membrs and now the public pariamentary purse) without every adding value or benefit. Nathan Rees, has in his first few months as Premier, demonstrated that he has no mettle, nor the intellectual capacity to clean the labor party and public service rubbish tips. The parliamentarians in this state are moribund in their roles, and performance, and parasites on the pulic purse. What NSW nees is a new voice, and leader, for the people. This person is not in the labor government and does not sit in the NSW parliament. Governments come and go and the public service reamins. That, in itself, is also a problem in NSW. However reality will bite in 2009 - 2010. The government has to quickly do something about the stifling barreirs and blockages created by the bureaucracy, the over zealous and stifling regulation and the rampant desire to manage life, society and economy without accountability and without responsibility. This goes also for their political masters. The intransient indifference of the bureaucracy and the power brokers in NSW, can be seen every day in the transport (rail) and ferry services. An arcahic self indulgent framework serving vested interests and a bloated management and empoloyee structure. Such enterprises breed inefficiency and corruption. Labor's manipulation of local government, and its endemic corrupt manipulation for benefit, has been put under the spotlight in Wollongong. There largesse, money and sex were, and are, the primary tools of exchange for decisiion making and patronage. Despite every attempt to ensure such things do not reach the centres of power, corrosion and corruption goes all the way up, down and across. This government, its Ministers and Premier, have scuttled away from that reality. There is nothing of credit for this government. The people of NSW just have to watch it take its last gasps whilst swimming in a cesspool of its own creation and maintenance. |
|
January 18, 2009: Federal parliamentarian
Joe Hockey
would be a good Premier for NSW in 2011
As specualtion is rife regarding the longevity of NSW labor premier Nathan Rees, demonstrating that he has enemies within the parliament and unions (what a surprise) attention turns to who might be the heir apparent to save NSW from total degradation and corrosion. Frank Sartor? John Della? Both do not politically inspire confidence and leadership potential in the public interest. The vivacious female members, for example, Carmel Tebbutt? Or maybe Christina Kenneally? Trouble is that these members of the parliament are members of labor and owe their place to the party machine. They are tarred with the labor brush and as such are in the collective. There are good members of the parliament but they are silent and that raises questions about their moral compass, ethics and beliefs in what the role of a parliamentarian should be. The good members should speak out or resign. The more who resign the greater pressure on the premier to call an election. Who has the character in the NSW labor party to trigger such a public benefit as an election now or soon? One might think that the NSW opposition might have a credible contender? Sadly not for the voters. The NSW liberal party leader at this time, Barry O'Farrell, has demonstrated no capacity to bring the NSW labor party to accountability. He has lost the confidence of the party hierarchy at the federal level, the bulk of the community and business, in NSW, through his stupid response and backdown on the sale of electricity assets. He has no plan to shame. embarrass and harrass the crooked and corrupt controllers of NSW. he has no plan to make the moribund and somewhat incompetent public service accountable and responsive. He has no charisma and no preseence to command respect and perhaps fear as a person. Where are the liberal contenders? Now there is a vacuum. Joe Hockey, former senior Minister in the federal parliament under John Howard holds the federal seat of North Sydney. he has become the defacto speaker for the liberals. A practiced and accoplished politician he hs the experience and the stamina to drag NSW out of the moribund state it is in. He too can clean out the bureaucracy. I have had a significant amount of interaction with a number of his prtfolios, and whilst not being a fan of the Howard government I can see the merit of Mr. Hockey moving from the federal parliament to the state. he is not beholden to unions, political apparatchiks or self serviing interests and is, unlike the cuurent crop of parliamentarians and bureaucrats, he is honest and hard working. The people of NSW can do far worse than embracing the change for Mr. Hockey. They might be collectvely stupid enough to maintain the current make up and power collectives. The federal labor government, of Kevin Rudd, would also benefit if Joe Hockey became the Premier of NSW. It would be less costly to the labor federal government and the state would be an asset and not a burden. The labor brand might not suffer the damage it has and will, in spades in 2009 and 2010, if the NSW labor governnment is removed by an act of altrusim of the good labor members. The NSW Constitution needs to be altered so that the people can throw governments, and members, out of power, and office, when needed. |
|
The labor government of NSW has been in power for eleven years as at 2008 and has
about the three years to go. It is probably the worst government in Australia. One of the labor government Ministers has been put
in jail for molesting children (2008), a
Minister has been sacked for
harassing, restraining and berating, a women (2008). There is some conjecture that he may be innocent.
Another did a lap dance at a party and Water Minister Phil Costa,
storms into a private construction site like Rambo followed by trade union offiials.
He looks like a cast member of the Australian television
drama "Underbelly". This is a government that has had, and may still have, in its ranks criminals, thugs and
unremarkably unqualified members of parliament. It is a government, and political party,
devoid of ethics and morality. Collectively it has no moral compass.
A group of warring tribes seeking self interest at every turn. It served by a public service with no soul and no
apparent moral leadershiop. It sits silent following the golden rule. Serve the government without question and at any cost.
The liberal, and national, opposition parties do not offer any alternative.
It is a craven regime refusing to make hard decisions, supporting its own power bases
and hanging around for alternative turns at the trough. The labor Premier Nathan Rees, and Treasurer Eric Roozendaal, are novices. They are brand spanking new, as at November 2008, and have just handed down a mini budget. The governmet wants tos ell a few piddling assets like lotteries to get some money in. The whole focus of the Treasurer is to protect the states AAA rating. Who gave them the rating? The same agency that rated sub prime mortgages as great value. The Premier in his own words is "having a red hot go". The government is introducing a congestion tax for drivers in the city going across the Harbour Bridge, raised taxes on what they consider to be rich property developers and owners. They have placed a parking tax on private CBD spots of $2,000 placing them in the top five countries that do this. They have increased coal taxes per tonne. This impost is placed on an industry that struggles under their dead hand and that of the bureaucracy, to meet export orders. They take the money yet have not invested in the government owned ports that are neede for export. Victoria can build a state oif tha art multi lane multi million dollar freeway in eighteeen months. It has taken NSW a decade to fail to complete a 100 Km section of the Hume Highway to make it dual carriage, just over the border in NSW from Victoria. The hospitals and schools are run down, and the overall management of the state is hardly worth contemplating. Doing business in NSW is both fruaght with ethical, and risk, issues. The cancer is in government and the bureaucracy. There are no bright lights on the horizon. |
|
The state of NSW is decrepit. Its agencies are anachronistic engaging in out dated and costly exercises both in management and their dealings
with the public and with business. Doing business with the NSW government and the public service departments potentially carries with it higher costs, and risks,
than in other states.
It languishes in economic arrest, under the dead hand of a labor
government that is mired in its own interests and internal warfare. It is a corruption of democracy, and goverment, in the widest sense.
It is state ruled by a handful of people whose purpose and role is not the public interest but in maintaining power.
The Premier Morris Iemma, and several of his Ministers, are in for a very rude shock. The people of NSW will be treated to a spectacle. It will be unedifying.
Read all about it
here.
|
|
CONTEMPT FOR GOVERNANCE STANDARDS, PARLIAMENTS AND PUBLIC PROCESSES
The media around Australia engages in futile drivel. They waste money and time on surveys as to who is the preferred in government/s, and opposition/s, at any point in time. This is really an annoying, and debilitating, it is a lot of crap to fill space and engineer worthless angst. They should grow up for the media, are, collectively, a blight on Australia's democracy. The media, and their owners, are culpable in contributing to the low value of Australia's governments' performance and the irrationality of politicians. The political journalists, and commentators, pursue irrelevant drivel. When you look at the quality of commercial television, radio and print, in general but particularly in relation to analysis of governments and politics you can see a marked decline in the intellectual, and enquiring, capacity of journalism, in Australia. It is not hard to realise that there is decay, in many influential sectors of the power collective, on a wide scale. Ethics and morality takes a back seat against the individual objective. The political parties (labor and liberal) and the selfish within them crave power at all costs. Even to the point of destroying the very esssence of public duty and honour. The code of conduct and the oath they take is vacuous. The NSW government demonstrates the overall proposition that democracy, across the nation, has been pirated by a parasitic public relations and communicatoons industry. They are prepared to lie and misinform and spin in order to win their obejective. This industry sector has convinced the gullible, low grade politicians that this is how modern politics is. Parliaments are a side show to political and corporate power interests. Two journalists from the Nine Network were hired. These two are yet more imposts on the public purse adding absolutely no value. It is thus that the politicians belief that telling lies and massaging messages is how good government and retentionof power is achived. These two new recruits proved their incompetence with email leaks. One of them is having a relationship with a state Minister. What does that say about Morris Iemma's contempt for governance? Or is it that he is a puppet dancing to someone else's overtures? A reshuffle of the NSW cabinet is on hold because the Premier is waiting for the public prsoecutor to decide if he will charge a Minister, John della Bosca, with an offence. della Bosca and his wife are both in parliament and should not be there for they add very little, probably no, value for the vast cost. Why John Bella Bosca is not in his bike, plus wife along with the likes of Reba Meagher is actually a window to the scurge of the NSW labor party. NSW government, is all about the selfish interests of a small group of self absorbed people. They are in parliament, in the unions and in the branches of the labor party. They, like the liberal party, are willing to gamble with and use the tens of billions of dollars of public monies at their disposal. They are ably supported in their mendacity and greed for power and position by a decrepit, and bloated, senior publioc service cabal. Premier Morris Iemma wants to privatise the electricity system, partially or whatever. The debate regrading this, like every other dabte, is not mature or economically evaluated. The spin merchants, of all sides of politics and the media, put out their garbage through their pet networks to a public that despises both sides of the political junta. Look at the constituency of the NSW parliament and the quality of the senior Ministers and the Opposition. The processes of government in NSW are like reality television. It appeals to a semi literate, self absorbed and under educated, demographic of the modern Australia society. We get what we deserve after all. |
|